BORROW
copyrighted work
Book TV
October 28, 2012 10:00pm-11:30pm EDT on CSPAN2

0 comments
Clips viewed 29 times

Richard Sander & Stuart Taylor Education. (2012) 'Mismatch How Affirmative Action Hurts Students It's Intended to Help, and Why Universities Won't Admit It.'

Broadcast Summary

00:00
lot tapes historians information traditionally recollections use bit goes rely arian tried offer types civile period things little places written balance research material documents basically
00:30
things oral filter written history happening end mind form room view right tried great tapes people memory faulty others someone remember memories filtering documents remarkably unscripted unrehearsed differently considerations
01:00
thank much book context tape everyone guest read recording transcripts david urge later sources next host
02:00
agree action affirmative applause university minorities half hour oral hurts court helps texas goals system prelim report fisher supreme authors hearing national argument
02:30
book thank roger published officially introduction bit try idea done much cato kick talk event start today relate little martin fisher hosting stewart thankful actually tomorrow mismatch mentioned happening
03:00
cato policy issues beginning 1990 aware community graduate organizing values lot stood particularly whether became glad become thinking type book school
03:30
social security subsidies structured interesting circulating big idea read paid part issue start class thing people debate reform policy around trying looking analyze started thought enormous benefits receiving happening providing
04:00
actually figure dynamics published interested willingness kato cato much sort book fact thing found debate seemed little policy nobody trying talking figured success politics
04:30
racial action greatest affirmative problems security 80 30 fix put deal much easy many later guess basis peace today early years sound senses degree harder social another perhaps analogy imagine problem feeling
05:00
may deal lingering interested innocently administrative got law hope issue later roger states taught issues united school harder working justice question progress mentioned
05:30
chance admitting happening interested preferences congratulating 90 50 bar idea ucla long sort sense might large sports passing students mismatch missions academic something important
06:00
students preferences admitting databases 45 preference cumulatively law hard wasn help much 2005 test 2004 went large meant looked seemed better school gotten through started degrees welcome schools angeles without looking outcomes
06:30
large students typically nationally preference especially 15 ten poor bulk paper scale group great found traits couple points hundred context african problem minority american developed generally receiving discussed
07:00
graduating supposedly collective preferences institutional unwillingness one law bar many 2000 legal great infil early lives third large people helped really struck school article attempt passing majority response starting affecting academics
07:30
law trying school interested instinctive institutions hard data went 2007 fact large salles engage became already broadly country obscure accurate restrict somebody received revealed reaction policies contacted prospects foundation preference information
08:00
done research independent ideological commissioned institutions lot past find good data shape based loose number partly social various journal efforts majority problems distance together excellent published scientists preferences empirically
08:30
large likely degrees science preference engineering 40 less mine much call math stem color found study whites larger student college measure friends receive problem students virginia although received university preferences
09:00
receive mismatch academics preferences academically predominantly low path class large voters grades bottom sunday passed chance decide become affects biggest science dropping students inclined academic clustered professors california university experience proposition
09:30
gone number blacks system university preferences 70 21 30 had half dozen cause clear large larger within racial degree banned entire happens bothers results receive national bachelor extremely neutrality experiment
10:00
ucla berkeley preferences hispanics permitted improvement bad gone much used point elite thing racial higher critics schools success science african problem outcome actually students dramatic admitted americans
10:30
students increased neutrality reputation integration universities ucla four next book many race page talk rates elite level things across effect cascade national campuses actually minority reported berkeley
11:00
schools preferences admit means second students top add far tier food book pick start elite tiers fourth fairly ladder largest graphic african economic hispanic american illustrate candidates ironically achievement
11:30
used elite schools preferences universities significantly led sort jerk tier knee fact often helps third fourth couple strong reasons defense leaders explain colleges moderate important
12:00
second threshold selective 20 universities requirements institutions low tier much pool state tears means worst third large highly simply absorb effect schools america cascade colleges contacts affected minority students 25 mismatch talented disparity
12:30
schools preferences aggravated discussions significantly qualifications much side talk left swath means racial things diverse another affects interest students mismatch something education diversity prominent
13:00
much interact moderated diversity documented preferences add less self doubt races words large likely racial affect affects schools climate research students socially distance academic
13:30
diversity vulnerable preference mismatched stereotypes institutional book part half fits taunt study large affect nicely talking finance closely believe problem devotees research students problems admitted behavior carefully
14:00
try higher education institution demonstrate deal institutions path line exist thing raised briefs follow nation george issues regime amicus fisher school another uniform effects existing evidence different difficult incredibly it solidarity nonstarter preferences
14:30
standards composite preference documented preferences implementing past find book rich court loose mercy issued racial across connor credit supreme college justice applied chapter research somewhat
15:00
try book write passionate interesting mechanically shot have done much 2003 scale issues policy school larger stuart broader experts engaging important accessible preferences
15:30
thank judge sander author professor otherwise co we book hear local today taylor stuart outside whether mismatch purchase applause audience bookstore succeeded
16:00
editor contributing published practicing journalist occasionally on law line copy books legal basic taylor fellow lawyer issues author policy stuart school writes journal resident national services lecturer focusing stanford freelance biography
16:30
law court media supreme princeton university york focus times lawyer wilmer writer school cutler senior believe writing current lecture harvard graduate reporter american attorney brookings institution correspondent distinguished constitutional
17:00
case talk please heartfelt relevance opportunity yes bit try cato much rick book focus books court thank taylor thanks little giving extend basics stuart supreme welcome evidence applause
17:30
case book issues focuses solutions preference etc size suit dwell racial pretty fisher making brought abigail started overall student problem similar reducing basically mismatched transparent
18:00
10 texas roughly admitted university school automatically 85 thought close 90 austin wasn grades students top
18:30
lower meanwhile qualified graduated university preferences got etc less sued knew lost went apply state texas saying people racial courts scores gotten obliged thought admitted
19:00
court university plan texas michigan precedent won help held both 2003 fifth uphold enough courts school supreme appeals obliged justice closely modeled circuit followed strictly
19:30
court racial strike supreme precedent preferences case 16 love much wide pull seven hated awake finds likely choice matter become perhaps thought history justices disagreed important
20:00
case racial holistic preferences holistically extraordinary holy kind word 2003 index court thing since texas water light need large green works likely fairly making long changed anything academic sprinkled preference university gave camouflaged composition complicated
20:30
achievement personal index born many hispanic 10 top asia call race black white texas sorry people outside playing consider literally emphasize components
21:00
tell racial little numbers different credentials seen best call race often pitch story scale texas thing makes campus finger groups recent arrive compare account whether whatever entering academic preference comparison university operational
21:30
main score gap points between university in 10 390 top tie 467 idea 2400 2009 mean scale black texas light agents racial blacks system looking outside freshmen accepted enormous
22:00
gaps country universities mismatched standpoint academically end big kind true scale means lower large almost likely racial little finger pretty trouble breaker students problems analysis withstand elsewhere selective described
22:30
university litigation preferences law traditional distinctions discriminated help fair wasn okay abby focus court black white texas cases giving strike number fisher school claims talking meeting approach students michigan problems complaint skeptical
23:00
10 case plan supposed diversity alternatives lot got size race heavy books avoid texas limit racial really needed resort wouldn connor pursue remain abuses justice enforce duration overrule particular principles preference
23:30
racial court proportions preferences composition unconstitutional top did try need dave close favor state texas haven mirror really cannot gotten another meaning argument although statewide balancing individual population university
24:00
years racial 25 supposed proportionality universities 16 isn gone goal next plan nine fact phase people within closer except another intends forever anything explicit anywhere statewide principle preparing perpetuate university preferences
24:30
every racial science critical different preferences isn mass years group texas class 158100 people whites course blacks may system groups trying through another classis far compete decades channels dropping manifest intention eye producing university systematically
25:00
research particular university universities demonstrated undergraduate 20 law long plan 2003 mass point asian court since black racial system struck school points supreme schools hispanic michigan explicit
25:30
struck average consistent university preferences substituted 20 14 bit high seem used point grade court racial little system connor spirit school larger points supreme justice instead holistic decision supposal michigan explicit
26:00
racial preferences suggests selective gpa principle unconstitutional lot 400 200 gap the gaps same group black white large stated unduly extent scores places points members another harming schools patronis evidence happened students
26:30
harm group racial members excluded preference abby race black might texas shows worse quote every unduly lights fisher misled harming primero evidence students foremost invented hispanic otherwise
27:00
black lucky students hispanic preferences outstanding find grow race read based class large likely bottom record talking usually thinking academic admitted qualified
27:30
racial remedy concealed disclosure preferences transparency isn ban cure full case gaps doing total court adopt large roger works people system strong minute research problems admitted
28:00
racial lawyers doctors preferences intelligent socioeconomic sort kept ahead large second secret policy public groups school larger measure routine matters getting example whatever children minority students admitted hispanic consumer protection preference
28:30
better economic inequality conclusion seamstresses egalitarianism cab hook stop thank white gives worse class metal roger people thanks system stuart making working drivers america operates children contrary applause qualified
29:00
card never carrying libertarians introduction conservatives pass book rick read hand fact based folks issue found stated header stuart sanders confused moderate anything
29:30
hand roger including president book regulatory opportunity alan hear case both side laws civil event legal equal issues impact center couldn rights either general focuses critics counsel arising morrison business problems laughter
30:00
general attorney assistant deputy division positions held reagan ki second acting higher ronald bush policy former rights action justice several civil natural highest degette created graduate including legal education resources associate solicitor department environment office affirmative administrations
30:30
thank applause inviting wonderful institute introduction law much cato rick yale nice book today begin roger please school stuart writing welcome keeping
31:00
book contribution multiple everybody unprecedented extraordinary got buy ways rick sort read lots many thing makes debate issues charts praise stuart written readable terrific diagrams
31:30
book people write terrific copies something particularly friends area authors family got really laughter smart brave
32:00
people reporters stuart round laughter whole much attacking academic bit academics start preferences friends things racial rick personal around little
32:30
book set great stuff line career bright jury humorous put true
33:00
court reading balance someday explain abolition racial university case preferences begin supreme
33:30
grounds national choosing tomorrow independent embarrassing six let act text area 1964 read part race civil court color title origin states united rights supreme picking
34:00
talking receiving assistance differently constitution discrimination much race mean color court title under origin really fisher program supreme federal abigail treated national happened disputed activity financial subjected
34:30
constitution means wiggle standards seems protection separate guarantees room straightforward guilaume little lot purpose although legal equal
35:00
court matter tuition clear college includes soon exception area words
35:30
must pretty clearly principal settle city york compelling somebody undeniable spoken strong discrimination identify nuclear helps branches something really bomb racial
36:00
emissions argument somewhat kawlija rehearsed interracial racial discrimination likely college
36:30
kids african compelling asian educational american preferences overwhelming students among conversations benefits something latino white
37:00
texas principal university supreme scientists recognized social ridiculous nondiscrimination indeed exception court
37:30
court moving important mind education marginal educational increasingly benefits jurisprudence provide disputed bear
38:00
costs inherent compelling discrimination consider educational liabilities involves benefits interest got racial engaging something crime
38:30
racial discrimination missions disturbing personally university web site post heart moral since costs little litany notice unfair comment illegal sections allowing political precedent
39:00
academic university excellence compromises stigmatizes beneficiaries set mind body eyes read worse future called lawyers quality overall removes mission student clients patience teachers incentive encourages separatism classmates
39:30
activities graduation much minorities competitive academically discriminate gets ones many among blood states racial needed social ethnic latinos college favored schools creates african deciding attitude unsavory involved problems pressure officials americans encourages
40:00
listed problems giving mismatch mention establish verse membership touches irrefutable real documentation chapter problem added ample
40:30
note happy sort stronger end emissions racial educational lot preferences might wrap benefits let
41:00
recently lot living people black country justices seems discriminated peery white
41:30
1994 americans minority something according preferences 30 ago age act four seem 1964 long born civil years group people rights system census latest talking anymore largest african schenker describe somebody
42:00
growing americans group african fastest racial president asian rapidly 12 white another either rate latinos minority larger people haven
42:30
people box country better according treat color ethnicity supports questionnaire worse section skin based regime ancestors check race seems legal
43:00
really believe people academics sen frequently arguing disparities let justification talking check racial anybody issue tell favor
43:30
latest government birthrates slavery compelling racial interracial federal disparities twice conversations figures interests
44:00
72 wedlock high pretty 29 latinos whites african americans print born births 62 51
44:30
ten asians called minorities racial fewer preferences american discriminated blacks five underrepresented indians 17 latinos typically whites
45:00
applause missions hear thank university
45:30
law public school interest traditional opportunities legal ways firms range small family find george lerner pursue service outside winning fund careers allyson pro sectors morrison students possible wide programs education dean assisting associate positions nonprofit bono washington government university seek
46:00
litigation consumers profession protecting government separation 25 for open long years legal class areas groups reform public worked rights career powers opening members citizen agencies directed involved including
46:30
virginia previously settlement state containing commercial legislative board never walls court cases class taught argued speech hawaii action making supreme council subject federal 20 entered harvard pharmacy citizens american consumer veto amendment including victories
47:00
law applause assistant commission university distinction navy city read alan york yale things please member stuart school served comment academy welcome harvard schools officer attorney graduate morrison
47:30
fisher practices incendiary remembering affirmative acknowledgement yet few let file okay book case name court brief begin medal honor second debate values action supreme lawsuit lawyers academic concrete
48:00
texas program university emission start protection guarantees top explaining fisher undergraduate abigail 10 emissions anyone violate supposed clause connection injured equal
48:30
high school applies business graduates anybody individuals filled texas guaranteed ranks 10 state something top clear schools necessarily second class limits
49:00
schools pedagogic preference necessarily interesting individuals 10 pat top bad rank sats many essey score texas third turns deals people wouldn brains places ecology reasons besides highest academic athletes musicians
49:30
texas around national least criteria country probably university thinks universities enough students place 10 top
50:00
high schools texas largely segregation economically law else many based white people highly racial reason program graduate socially anything required patterns hispanics segregated university residential
50:30
racial groups diversity fifth completely significant schools insufficient class numbers done largely minorities able
51:00
index approach academic dillinger combination achievement box down axis call point grade title boxes number single axises school stuart another average consists holistic
51:30
factor factors six race called circumstances isn each point total index score within single points things member coming special vendors personal combined although included involved specific recognized achievement understanding
52:00
number gets numbers intersection undergraduate circumstances end box need locks total music based people bottom things denied across program ability athletic admitted everybody admission leadership
52:30
different depending hispanics increasing particular determination 60 80 10 top goal mass talk final noble quota turns clause number reason wanted desire called general numbers african critical programs admitted americans
53:00
90 state people attend actually difficulties 10 goal soft years bring texas means little diverse numbers careful holistic addition question approach attended minority students admitted difficult statistics university minorities
53:30
part exactly preferred small hispanics race africans determine admittedly believe impossible gets numbers admitted really large much
54:00
preference strange approach case one americans quarter plaintiffs theater top defendants african approximate things 10 numbers holistic four slight
54:30
much important proof terms parties harm numbers making kind significant case ineffectually rather later sides help saying irony resolve court thing
55:00
comply plaintiff argued showing much both diversity saying ground accepting factor end interesting court narrow burden racial broadly side giving
55:30
specifics plaintiff additional importantly significant achievement six put high miss index goals score burden impact quotas enough couple capano effect fisher gotten points general program showing highest question academic
56:00
system gotten assigned admitted specific difficulty got box help much tell else race based state goals makes quotas course result anyone harmed scoring numbers argument
56:30
program admitted maybe important impossible reconstruct ms else kind irony might texas tried clear summer people number admits fisher another regular lawsuit anybody creates happened arguments
57:00
future university standing monetary completed injunction far wasn paid texas aware class thing export sought damage action prevent claimed program damages seeking
57:30
clear amendment something university application circumstances fee 100 11th much test meet right money state texas wants thing range model people states unless engage waived called clearly getting entitled prevents activity
58:00
show emotional washington violations intentional constitution hard case court means clear davis damage versus called supreme damages seeking getting thought entitled somebody problems something violating presented
58:30
case justices potential solicitor university conferences isn four tide tree acted fifth brief texas eight filed order amicus appeals general support sitting circuit deciding certainly
59:00
discriminated interested minorities historically nevertheless unconstitutional data long took true case fact among court prove might briefs system asians harmed course chinese pointed dubious periods despite history remedies japanese
59:30
high texas school graduates population numbers elite percentage college arbor american maybe leaving colleges second able problems asian university aside overall
01:00:00
university diversity obviously percentage sufficient constitute 60 let ways else they apply texas class higher couple points entering accepted admitted rationale everybody
01:00:30
class decide criteria alone structure include minorities able achievement attempt universities account academic
01:01:30
diversity hispanics rationale disregard admissions university 10 top quo race easy gave texas number accept second system answer besides reasons earlier without african increase adequate entirely americans
01:02:00
black student american education subjected association byes grew fact essay front thing expect lawyer really police arrest member needed reader strike ghetto become decided anybody officer african personal students
01:02:30
race essay individual experiment university indication mind able sure case kind last many fact court texas every thing wishes narrow supreme through readers despite problem respects somebody disregard
01:03:00
dot united citizens without applause yes thank litigants wondered discussion broadly much comments quick example laughter open floor
01:03:30
need quick listen different affirmative transparency oh why mine much okay mean right facts based three leave roger facted sounds better action reason extent points talking america minutes selected dialogue universes
01:04:00
system preferences hundredth proportion information transparency move idea funk parts maybe really actual looking forward believe secondly relevant whatever holistic selected complete operation disclosed
01:04:30
life race specific individual lot experiences unsuccessfully put simp rank thet call essay whole saying people unless codray connor trying shaped person certain justice looking systems forward economic eligible criteria students profound
01:05:00
people getting diversity sympathetic preferences institutions vast grew fact upper seems feels class middle police simply another looking systems analogy ghettos wealthy african problem selected majority arrested americans receiving preference backgrounds
01:05:30
case decide university educational experiences disagreement lot big ora deal give need sort kind view shaky court reach great agree reasons without changes improper standing actually apparent anything legitimacy
01:06:00
reached case versus decide juvenile disturbing row gay ago yeah wade else true tome court might texas death awhile issues united rights supreme penalty shouldn lawrence anything citizens anywhere
01:06:30
case reach cases justifies principles policymaking body point allen court helps under cause shunt maybe little decide broader reached shouldn evolved serious problem stretches
01:07:00
politicians institution not performances transparency socioeconomic systematically ban rest book major grips every works racial failed impose society suggest details america mislead country opinion problem remedies attacked component terrified applicants politician university
01:07:30
years 20 spoke comments affirmative policymaking 16 non ain down slow next rick body brief limit court maybe roger racial branch unless change stuart action supreme hundred publicly laughter something political preferences
01:08:00
gotten huge whether texas parties issues rick relevant basically sat stuart gail significant distinguishability scores gaps fisher talked abby
01:08:30
something relegated arguments everything population instructive put lot else foot case shoe merit court stage agree merits asians decide general footnote argument standing instance
01:09:00
ivy jews league achievement discriminated justification 75 50 ago anti body mean years texas thing saying things quotas jewish nobody weighed student academic addition percentage
01:09:30
different rich alumni manner scholarships discriminating much tuba race okay legal texas happy basis thing people anyway looked players whether question academic historical achievement quarterbacks
01:10:00
race defer comes weighing admitted discrimination 60 to 50 ole let ago miss gets sure okay talk rein texas years racial general schools classes deciding deferring university structuring
01:10:30
study many proves scores studies reports proceedings none contradict briefs talk perplexing thing type subject completely read trial
01:11:00
court supreme studies supposed question contradictory lot the deal fine book rick read side bunch forth wrong based indeed briefs appear answer matter invalid problem deciding district
01:11:30
considered university legislative legislature proceedings transparency sat sit type least texas trial agree aspect extent stuart perhaps thought without studies decision programs important conscious presented proceeding
01:12:00
known program wonderful particular identifying transparency ms tell kept money facts court maybe order people asking result seemed anyone secret remedy fisher always supreme unclear details getting admitted discovery litigation
01:12:30
education hispanics microphone affiliation congressional correspondent may let end love rest gets wait years court thank woman peggy leave please higher census outlook diverse covered identify covering hispanic audience conundrum questions
01:13:00
race hispanics directed recognize anymore considered involved particular factor distinguished checking colleges multirace kids stab
01:13:30
needed hispanics population affirmative performance socioeconomically end leg idea used yeah break lower logic people legacy blacks trying action quickly started slavery question extended although inaudible
01:14:00
people benefit especially sometimes california prescription stop often began point texas posed spoil block course racial system harmed reason voting evolved growing powerful affluent political diagnosis hispanics
01:14:30
question steven identify ask gentleman outside everything saying cato considered retired affiliation right kind events assumes box hank sort
01:15:00
need price divvied therefore whether pay service university criteria achievement cry people administered academic throw provided determine willing idea every society
01:15:30
education may best discussion university affirmative ab lot need sent fact times clear people really little things pretty action student weakest question brilliant
01:16:00
customers okay alan situation definitely beneficiaries move able many money guess worth today ahead comes people states really united higher degree college classes probably directed academic laughter education remaining
01:16:30
money college inaudible program government pay university treated marketplace people systems gives enter succeed anything poor quick
01:17:00
system changing price aclu graduate hi another humphrey hand assistant recent microphone hold understand yes policy criteria close lady guess kim
01:17:30
may related graduates class race part generally arrested important issues point assumption address conversation middle guess playing policies stem anyone
01:18:00
race guess preferences support regardless across transparent point question transparency others need athletic kind issue biggest certainly aren saying board
01:18:30
least things legacies athletic scholarships significant long alan else raise state issue people debate giving factor degree school subject divulge staying identify somebody anything required university performance
01:19:00
ability based question university irrelevant scholarships may race bring raise throw accept debate ground things public factor subject account whether defends moreover criteria academic different admission presumably viewpoints
01:19:30
race question something differently intelligent transparency law mind much alan keep ugly civil agree people legacy debate public extent special believe whether benefit problem uniquely treating supposed preferences
01:20:00
social science evidence scientists ridiculous indeterminant alan point right court kinds equal talked clause wanted supreme reasons depends exactly shouldn different carvedded exception protection
01:20:30
stem point majors students gentleman discriminating need blue race grads shirt basis black maybe roger quick little people chance misled college wanting colleges becoming hispanic
01:21:00
woodstock institute washington percentage university interesting mr born tell gave greg thing board people number awhile george member wedlock outside sanders account skuires accounts previous question patterns
01:21:30
worse slavery discrimination getting cultural complicated jim you crow years wages great causes rather system better worked social result society numbers welfare
01:22:00
science children bad social morality american community society fact acceptable religion particular wedlock show fundamentally african anything lot forces become
01:22:30
absolutely recognized achievement correlation politically increasingly two got man long fire rest mean brave 1960s storm issue sides daniel parent reason career pointed nothing patrick stopped families becoming criticism incorrect
01:23:00
rosenberg pathology blog gentleman correlation particularly discrimination john draw boys last name right close sorry aisle roger law father couple social strong school writing home trouble getting whether without growing minutes next whatever question dropping
01:23:30
end book race really magisterial incomparable got call heard given based mainly longer stuart reasons banning calling thought remember question surprise strongest preferences
01:24:00
much preferences narrower governor specific schoolhouse ll mr rid ask end door obey veto grew race book moved stood seems state never along really things heckler proposed question argument
01:24:30
preferences middle limiting interesting transparency socioeconomic lot cap aid size race based three third talked number points trying outlaw keeping argument financial abolishing
01:25:00
argument race based legal policy unconstitutional 17 18 try aid fast read facts apply could answer wouldn illegal chapter example chapters laughter financial questions important admissions preferences
01:25:30
chapters laughter fashioned seriously mismatched preferences 10 17 old tex end top buy fine whip long book read glad kids mean plan bring worst ending shrink reason wimped opinions
01:26:00
race based benefit scholarships analysis preferences cost racial why ban easy point horse cross black hobby court clear talked gotten supreme banning bidding without students benefits affluent encourages mismatches
01:26:30
race need based people thought preferences end hey run slam penn dunk yale claim money avoid overs second handle rather offers around larger harvard whether whatever necessary universities socioeconomic
01:27:00
question avaition chandler gentleman consultants scholarships row high plug last name tech right plawg second things middle gerald getting married without directly children
01:27:30
many married children born family getting 20 30 yet may end tact years child roger maybe stable anybody without actually evidence transform eventually divorcedded relationships
01:28:00
sex people statistics everything preferences interesting 18 two same much kids fact view favor decry issue roger racial better parent reason ethnic marriage families opposite pressure solution mandatory
01:28:30
yeah number african school american kids directly years old traceable real implosion black family gap
01:29:00
born kid maybe couples understand possibilities 72 book joke read ones away right numbers wedlock explain outside married african disaster national children divorced americans available
01:29:30
students mismatch audience applause affirmative universities let why help span rick sign glad join being thank floor lunch hurts admit second sander copies stuart action another speaker meeting intended

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)